
Alyssa Garcia, Lanh Lai, Anna Vasileva
Apparent Concentrations of Chloride, Sulfate and Nitrate in the Edward's Aquifer Recharge Zone
The Case Study of The Four Countries and Results
For our study we used public data from the Texas Water Development Board for sulfate, nitrate, and chloride compound concentrations. While these compounds are not immediate threats to the public’s health and well-being we chose to focus on them at levels which may yield cause for concern. Concentrations are represented in the density unit milligram per liter.
For nitrate we chose to focus our study on levels higher than 10 mg/L. This is the standard set by the Environmental Protection Agency. Concentrations of nitrate above this level can be hazardous to human health and are especially dangerous for pregnant women and infants. Previous studies have shown that there is a correlation between nitrate levels above 10 mg/L and a condition known as methemoglobinemia, blue baby syndrome, where blood lacks the ability to carry enough oxygen to cells throughout the body and cause the baby’s skin and veins to appear blue in color.
While chloride is a compound that is typically considered a background trace element, it can also indicate contamination from human or animal waste, which also contain high amounts of chloride. The recommended maximum value for Chloride in drinking water set by the EPA is 250 mg/L. Concentrations above this level can cause water to have an unpleasant salty taste and can lead to the corrosion of distribution systems for drinking water. Chloride is also associated with sodium, which may negatively affect those on sodium-restricted diets.
Sulfate is another element that is commonly found in drinking water, however concentrations exceeding 250 mg/L are known to have a laxative effect on humans and animals and can lead to dehydration and diarrhea. Elderly and children are most susceptible to these effects, however healthy humans are also known to be able to adapt to some elevated sulfate levels after the initial adverse side effects. Sulfate, like Chloride can also cause corrosion of pipes.
Table 1. Concentration Table
This table details the concentrations of each compound that we chose to focus on for our project and our interpretation. NOTE: Due to limited data access, the project used public data for sulfate, nitrate, and chloride compound concentrations. Those compounds are not as health concerning as Arsenic. For the purpose of the project, high compound concentrations were used to represents the same objective of the project. TWDB public data was used for Sulfate, Nitrate, and Chloride concentrations values. Concentrations are represented in density unit, mg/L.
The Texas Water Development board defines pollution as the alteration or contamination of the physical, thermal, chemical, or biological quality of any water in the state, or the contamination of any water in the state, that renders the water harmful, detrimental, or injurious to humans, animal life, vegetation, property, or public health, safety, or welfare or that impairs the usefulness of the public enjoyment of the water for any lawful or reasonable purpose (Board, 2005).
The span of our project is defined by the monitored wells by the Texas Water Development Board within Bexar, Comal, Medina, and Uvalde counties. High concentrations for our selected compounds are labeled as contaminated because they are above normal background levels.
The data we obtained ranged from the 1950s to 2015. The primary objective is to observe the change of water quality over time for our selected element concentrations. In order to accomplish this and easily identify trends in our data, we divided our data into 20 year intervals. The three time intervals are from the year 1955 to 1975, 1975 to 1993, and 1993 to 2015. Possible sources that might have led to the contamination, such as landfills, cattle and livestock feedlots, water treatment plants, and golf courses are depicted and potentially vulnerable areas surrounding them are delineated by buffers. The data for well locations were obtained from the TWDB website and converted to an Excel File. Worksheets were divided in Excel by years. The x and y coordinates for decimal longitude and latitude were imported into ArcMap.

Compound Concentrations of Nitrate, Sulfate, and Chloride in the Edward’s Aquifer Recharge Zone
Wait for the slides to move automatically, or click through
The figures below demonstrate the surfaces that were created for the concentrations of each compound at the specified time. The green symbols represent possible source points, which are surrounded by a 2 mile buffer zone. The maps from 1993-2015 show population dot density for our areas. The maps from 1955-1975 and 1975-1993 have point features that say the estimated population of each county.
Nitrate Spatial Analysis


Difference in Nitrate Concentrations
Following our data processing it appeared that nitrate had the greatest increase in concentration over time, compare to sulfate and chloride. In order to pinpoint the areas of interest we used the Minus spatial Analyst tool in ArcMap.
Areas of concentration increase are white, while areas of decrease are darker grey and neutral areas are true grey.
Problem Areas for Nitrate
This map depicts areas in our studied counties that have shown a large
increase in nitrate concentration in groundwater. We recommend that the Edwards Aquifer Authority increase regulations for these particular
regions.
Closer look at the Sources of Exceeding Amounts of Nitrate Concentrations
Through our study we were able to locate two possible point sources of nitrate pollution in groundwater. One was the Chaparral Feeders Inc. feedlot in Uvalde, TX. This is shown by the first image. The second was Brackenridge Golf Course in San Antonio, TX. Both locations displayed very high levels of nitrate in surrounding groundwater and the concentrations decreased radially away from the location.
We would advise the Edward’s Aquifer Authority to investigate these businesses and the cause of these alarming concentration levels. It is possible that these concentrations may be in the groundwater at such elevated levels because of local terrain.




1955-1975 Chlolide

1975-1993 Chlolide

1993-2015 Chlolide

1955-1975 Chlolide

1955-1975 Nitrate

1975-1993 Nitrate

1993-2015 Nitrate

1955-1975 Nitrate

1955-1975 Sulfate

1975-1993 Sulfate

1993-2015 Sulfate

1955-1975 Sulfate
Chloride Concentration
Nitrate Concentration
Sulfate Concentration